Friday, July 07, 2006

Spirituality and consciousness again - Part V

The point made in the previous post was that, if you are committed to your own growth - that is, to becoming (more) conscious - then this can not be achieved on your own. Ongoing feedback from someone - ideally someone with whom you share your life - is necessary to continue to grow in consciousness. A close friend can also play this role, as can a therapist, a spiritual teacher or a seminar facilitator. But having a relationship with someone able to provide feedback is not sufficient. You need to have enough trust in the other person to surrender (not to submit) to the whole process. As always with these things, the ideas are easier to convey than the reality of what is required. You need to have reached a certain level of maturity in your own growth, a level at which you feel comfortable enough and secure enough to be humble without being self-effacing. The humility I am referring to has nothing to do with the sham humility encouraged in some cultures. This kind of humility actually comes from strength. Only when you feel strong enough within yourself, when you have a strong sense of who you are, can you allow someone else to reflect back to you information that can potentially threaten your false identity, your false self concept, your inaccurate perception of yourself. Who you are can not and will not be threatened. Who you are - your essence - is indestructible. Its essential nature is goodness, beauty, peace and light. Nothing can touch that. When you are conscious, you know this beyond words and you can therefore trust that if someone who loves you and cares for you gives you information about some aspect of yourself that is negative - and even, perhaps, that feels offensive or insulting - it is your false self that is being challenged, not who you are. In addition, you know that they can only feed back what is true for them, that, at the end of the day, you are the final judge of what is true for you [To be continued]

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Spirituality and consciousness again - Part IV

I ended the last post by saying that "you can't do it alone". The best and most powerful growth-enhancing environment is a committed relationship. This was something I recognised in mid-1987 when I completed my "training" (for want of an appropriate word) with Self Transformation Seminars (ST). Although I continued both to assist and to participate in further courses and seminars with both ST and other organisations, I was clear that my further growth required a life partner. For me, that meant an intimate relationship with a woman. It also meant that there were certain qualities that she had to possess, if I was to continue to grow on my self-chosen path. I needed someone whose life purpose was aligned with mine. I needed an experience of beauty. I needed someone whose consciousness had evolved neither too far ahead nor too far behind my own. I needed someone who could commit to me and to my growth, as I would commit to her and to her growth. I needed someone to know me at least as well as I knew myself, preferably better, so she could guide me and teach me, as I would guide and teach her. I needed to be with someone who was committed to their own growth, not merely in word, but in action. Amongst other things, the above entailed a relationship in which we would each be willing both to give and to receive feedback, without defending our position. When we fell short, as we would, we needed to be both willing and able to surrender to each other and to the divine. If I couldn't find someone with whom I could create such a relationship, I was willing to remain alone.

Within a relationship like the one above - a "conscious relationship" - deeper and deeper parts of myself could and did emerge and continue to emerge. Sometimes they are what we call "positive" qualities. At other times they are what we call "negative" ones. At times, when we jointly discover a new "gremlin", conflict arises, even serious conflict that threatens the relationship. But neither of us is willing to keep the hidden impulses, fantasies and desires secret, either from each other or from ourselves. Our life has thus become a journey of exploration and discovery, including self-discovery. I have sometimes told Harbans: "It's no big deal if you love me when I am lovable. Anyone can do that. Can you love me when I am not lovable, when I reveal my ugliness, my deceitfulness or pettiness?" So far the answer seems to be "yes". Without her willingness to challenge me and my willingness to surrender when I can't see what she can, there would always remain some parts that are invisible to me, some areas of unconsciousness, some items in my shadow. The feedback from my partner is absolutely essential to my continuing growth toward becoming conscious and remaining conscious.

Before embarking on this joint adventure with Harbans, I had other guides, namely the therapists, facilitators and teachers of the various personal growth seminars and courses I participated in. Assistants on the courses and fellow participants also performed this function to some extent. Some became close friends afterwards and, in this capacity, continued to play this role, as I did for them. When I became embroiled in a piece of unconscious drama (is there any other kind?) the following year, it was to a small number of my former fellow course participants, the course teacher and a therapist that I turned for some feedback and guidance and they cared enough not to indulge my self-deception and blindness but to challenge my perceptions and actions until I became conscious again and faced reality, including the reality of my illusions. They proved themselves real friends in the process, even though we subsequently moved away from one-another. Without either a committed relationship, a genuine friendship, or someone - such as a therapist or a seminar facilitator or teacher - who can guide you and provide you with feedback, I don't believe you can grow in consciousness [To be continued]

Spirituality and consciousness again - Part III

The point I have been attempting to make in the two previous posts - a point I feel unconfident about being able to convey - is that, for those of us born in "the modern world" (but, more and more, for almost anyone born on the planet), "conscious living" (as I have been using this phrase in this blog) is virtually impossible. Another way to say this is to speak in terms of authenticity. It has become very, very difficult, if not impossible, to be authentic. For most people this is a non-issue. It becomes an issue for people who have chosen a path of personal growth, of spiritual growth, of being the very best that they can be. It is a huge issue for people who have not merely chosen to become conscious but who believe that, after many years of being on the path, they are now "conscious" or "awake" or "enlightened" (including gurus and other spiritual teachers). The conclusion I have reached, after over two decades of being on this kind of path, is that the most dangerous of all illusions is the illusion of having reached such a goal.

What I would like to do in the next few paragraphs is to convey, to anyone who feels a need for guidance, what you can do to become more conscious, more awake, more aware of your undisclosed selves, especially those that inhabit the deep dark recesses of your consciousness, the ones you truly do not believe (at this moment) that you possess. In our seminars and our one-to-one counselling sessions, we often refer to "the shadow"; at other times we might talk about "the unconscious"; sometimes we use different words (For example, Harbans sometimes refers to "the parts that are not visible to you, but which run your life, because it takes energy to push them down or to disown them - and those parts use that energy to run you"). In all these cases we are referring to the dark, unknown places most of us do not want to visit or even to acknowledge. Our understanding is that, while these unknown areas often contain hidden goodness and beauty, they equally often contain impulses that we generally label as "evil", "perverse", "spiteful" or "violent". Our experience is that the more one emphasises "love and light" the more powerful these impulses become, as they demand to be heard and seen, as they seek self-expression. This is what makes them dangerous, to both self and other.

Why, you may ask, do we have these impulses in our shadow at all, especially if we have spent many years in therapy, or meditating, or doing seminars and personal growth courses and workshops? Our understanding is that our essence is, indeed, love, beauty, peace, goodness and light but that, in our human form, we embody both ends of the polarities labelled "good" and "bad", "good" and "evil", "love" and "hate", "peacefulness" and "violence", "light" and "darkness". At the moment of conception, we carry all the qualities of which human beings are capable - the best and the worst - as potential. By the time we are born, some of these have been eliminated as possibilities, though most remain as potential. Although the human brain and nervous system have only partly been constructed at the moment of birth (most of it during the third trimester), an enormous amount of growth remains to be completed during the first two years of life, by which time some 80% of the brain is complete. The growth continues during the third year and, indeed, during the rest of our lives. We are at no point a totally "finished product" (although the first three years may well represent a "critical period" for brain development, together with the final three months as a fetus). What takes place during this time (in the womb, during the critical first three years and then during the rest of our journey) is what determines "who we are", in the sense in which most of us understand this phrase. Almost noone in the modern world has all (or even most) of the needs of normal growth satisfied (natural birth, breastfeeding for as long as needed - probably for well over two years - sleeping with the parents and being in constant physical contact during the first year at least and being attended to and comforted when the baby cries or otherwise communicates her needs - these are the bare minimum). But even if the baby's and young child's needs are satisfied and she grows up as a healthy, conscious human being, she retains, AS POTENTIAL IF NOT NECESSARILY AS ACTUALITY, all the qualities and characteristics of which human beings are capable. For most of us, we need not concern ourselves with such a scenario, because our experiences, especially our early childhood experiences, have been far from such an ideal. That means that, apart from the fact that unsavoury characteristics - such as perverse or violent or spiteful impulses for example - are always present as potential, for most of us, many of these impulses are also present, somewhere in our consciousness, as actuality, irrespective of whether we are aware of them or not. "Nihil humanum a mihi alienum puto" ("I believe nothing human to be alien to me"), written by Terentius 2000 years ago, sums up what I am trying to say. "There but for the grace of God walk I" is another way to say the same thing. That is the reason for the principle advocated by the ancient Greeks (Socrates being but one among many), "Know thyself".

Now much of this may be obvious to you already. Our experience is that, even amongst people we have come to know well, the principle may be obvious in the abstract but not when it comes to themselves! How can you know whether and how any of this applies to you? Here's how. If you are a human being and you are still alive it applies. How can you make use of this in your everyday life so that you will continue to grow? I would like to suggest the following, all of which Harbans and I have done and continue to do.

The first "how" is that you can't do it by yourself [To be continued]

Tuesday, July 04, 2006

Spirituality and consciousness again - Part II

In the last post I asked readers to have a look at three previous posts on this subject. I hope you have taken the time to do so, because i would like to continue from where those three left off, rarher than repeating what I have written. Nevertheless, some repetition is inevitable. The essential message in the previous posts can perhaps be summed up like this: Although we are, indeed, essentially spiritual beings, as taught by all the great spiritual traditions - in particular, in such texts as the Vedas, the Upanishads, the Bhagavad Gita or the hundreds of Buddhist texts, for example - we are also human beings who live in the physical world of space and time. We have physical bodies, which have needs and we have "personalities" (or, if you prefer, "egos", "character structures", "personas" or "identities"). The planet we inhabit has a history, as do the various societies, cultures or socio-economic structures into which we are born. The modern world most of us inhabit - but, more and more, other, so-called "developing" societies, too - does not meet the needs of babies, children or adults and result in what has here been called unconsciousness, a state which could equally accurately be characterised as one in which our humanity has been seriously eroded. The effects are what we call "the real world" and are visible every time we turn on our TV sets, open a newspaper, or, indeed, step outside our homes (they are also visible within our homes, but perhaps less visibly for some).

Amongst people who are on a deliberately chosen path of personal growth, the above is taken for granted. What is not well understood is that the effects of living in this so-called "real world" are extremely difficult to undo. I wrote about this in the three previous post. What I would like to do now is to extend the discussion by suggesting that unconsciousness (as described previously in several posts) is far more widespread than almost anyone on a spiritual path is willing to admit [See http://andrewreiner.blogspot.com/2005/11/what-is-conscious-living.html and http://andrewreiner.blogspot.com/2005/11/reclaiming-our-humanity.html ]. Further, amongst those who acknowledge that this is, indeed, the case, there is, in almost all instances, an unwillingness to face this within themselves. This is very dangerous [To be continued]

Monday, July 03, 2006

Spirituality and consciousness again

Before writing about this topic again, I ask readers to read the three previous posts on this topic at:

http://andrewreiner.blogspot.com/2006/03/spirituality-and-unconsciousness.html

http://andrewreiner.blogspot.com/2006/03/spirituality-and-unconsciousness-part.html

http://andrewreiner.blogspot.com/2006/03/spirituality-and-consciousness.html